We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Is Grocery Outlet Stock a Buy as Its Valuation Looks Cheap?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
GO trades at 15.29x forward P/E, below the industry's 17.07, after shares fell 16.3% YTD.
GO saw transactions rise 2.1%, but comps fell 1% as average transaction size dropped 3.1%.
Grocery Outlet is closing 36 stores and expects about $12M annualized adjusted EBITDA improvement.
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO - Free Report) is trading at a discounted valuation despite efforts to stabilize sales and improve profitability. The investment case hinges on whether the company can convert improving traffic trends, store optimization efforts, and a rebuilding opportunistic product mix into a sustainable earnings recovery.
The setup is attractive on price, but the next leg depends on execution. It is about whether near-term pressure on comparable sales, baskets, and margins can ease fast enough to support a cleaner recovery.
GO’s Neutral Setup: Upside Levers vs. Execution Risk
Grocery Outlet’s differentiated model is still a clear draw. Opportunistic sourcing, deep discounts on rotating “WOW!” deals, and an Independent Operator structure support a compelling customer value proposition and localized execution.
Management is also pushing initiatives that can improve consistency over time. Merchandising upgrades and store refreshes are designed to strengthen engagement and drive trip frequency.
The trade-off is that near-term results remain uneven. Comparable sales are still negative, basket size is soft, promotional intensity is elevated, and operating costs are rising. Those factors have kept pressure on margins and made the recovery look gradual rather than immediate.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Grocery Outlet’s Earnings Bridge: What Must Improve
The latest quarter highlighted the checklist investors should watch. Comparable-store sales fell 1%, reflecting a 3.1% decline in average transaction size that more than offset a 2.1% increase in transactions. That mix signals improving traffic, but a basket that still needs rebuilding.
Margins are the next swing factor. Gross margin was 29.6%, down 80 basis points year over year, with part of the decline tied to markdowns and write-offs connected to optimization actions and the rest pressured by promotions used to bridge gaps in opportunistic supply.
Finally, expense leverage has to return for adjusted EBITDA to recover. Selling, general and administrative expenses rose to 29.8% of sales, and adjusted EBITDA fell to $43.1 million, with margin down to 3.7%. Management’s outlook keeps the near-term bar clear: second-quarter comparable sales are expected to decline 1.5% to 2%, while adjusted EBITDA is projected at $55 million to $58 million.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
GO’s Optimization Plan Aims To Lift EBITDA Quality
A key element of the strategy is pruning weaker assets. Grocery Outlet is closing 36 underperforming stores, with 27 closures completed in the first quarter and the remaining nine completed in April.
Management expects these optimization and restructuring actions to produce about $12 million of annualized adjusted EBITDA improvement once completed. The goal is a cleaner fleet mix with less operational drag and more resources concentrated in higher-return locations.
This matters because it links portfolio actions directly to earnings quality. If the company can remove low-return stores while tightening underwriting for new units, the path to more stable profitability becomes clearer.
Grocery Outlet’s Expansion Gets More Disciplined
Expansion is shifting toward returns-focused growth. Management is applying more rigorous site selection, higher return thresholds, and clustered expansion in core markets to improve supply chain efficiency, brand awareness, and operating leverage.
New store underwriting standards are also rising. The company is targeting stores capable of generating returns above 25%, with an ambition to approach 30% over time, and it is prioritizing higher-volume locations with stronger long-term economics.
For the current fiscal year, the plan calls for 30-33 net new store openings, excluding closures tied to optimization actions. That approach is meant to balance growth with profitability and reduce the risk of adding lower-quality units.
GO Valuation Context
The valuation case starts with what has already been discounted. GO shares are down 16.3% year to date, lagging both the Zacks Consumer Staples sector and the broader market.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, Grocery Outlet’s forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio stands at 15.29, lower than the industry’s ratio of 17.07. It is also trading below its 12-month median level of 19.04, suggesting investors have yet to fully price in the company’s recovery potential.
In practical terms, the multiple has room to expand if comparable sales stabilize, margins stop sliding, and adjusted EBITDA begins to rebuild on cleaner fundamentals.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
A Practical Playbook for GO Investors
For now, the stock carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), which supports a “monitor” posture while investors track whether the company can convert traffic gains into healthier baskets and better profit flow-through. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Signals that fundamentals are improving would include a better comparable-sales trajectory than current guidance, a stabilization in average transaction size, and evidence that margin pressure is easing as promotions normalize. Delivery of the expected annualized adjusted EBITDA uplift from optimization actions would also reinforce the earnings-quality angle.
What would undermine the thesis is a prolonged basket decline, margin pressure that lasts longer than expected, or a weaker comparable-sales trend that keeps leverage out of the model. Competition remains intense, with larger players such as Walmart Inc. (WMT - Free Report) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST - Free Report) able to pressure pricing and promotional activity, which can make GO’s margin stabilization harder to achieve.
Zacks' 7 Best Strong Buy Stocks (New Research Report)
Valued at $99, click below to receive our just-released report
predicting the 7 stocks that will soar highest in the coming month.
Image: Bigstock
Is Grocery Outlet Stock a Buy as Its Valuation Looks Cheap?
Key Takeaways
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO - Free Report) is trading at a discounted valuation despite efforts to stabilize sales and improve profitability. The investment case hinges on whether the company can convert improving traffic trends, store optimization efforts, and a rebuilding opportunistic product mix into a sustainable earnings recovery.
The setup is attractive on price, but the next leg depends on execution. It is about whether near-term pressure on comparable sales, baskets, and margins can ease fast enough to support a cleaner recovery.
GO’s Neutral Setup: Upside Levers vs. Execution Risk
Grocery Outlet’s differentiated model is still a clear draw. Opportunistic sourcing, deep discounts on rotating “WOW!” deals, and an Independent Operator structure support a compelling customer value proposition and localized execution.
Management is also pushing initiatives that can improve consistency over time. Merchandising upgrades and store refreshes are designed to strengthen engagement and drive trip frequency.
The trade-off is that near-term results remain uneven. Comparable sales are still negative, basket size is soft, promotional intensity is elevated, and operating costs are rising. Those factors have kept pressure on margins and made the recovery look gradual rather than immediate.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Grocery Outlet’s Earnings Bridge: What Must Improve
The latest quarter highlighted the checklist investors should watch. Comparable-store sales fell 1%, reflecting a 3.1% decline in average transaction size that more than offset a 2.1% increase in transactions. That mix signals improving traffic, but a basket that still needs rebuilding.
Margins are the next swing factor. Gross margin was 29.6%, down 80 basis points year over year, with part of the decline tied to markdowns and write-offs connected to optimization actions and the rest pressured by promotions used to bridge gaps in opportunistic supply.
Finally, expense leverage has to return for adjusted EBITDA to recover. Selling, general and administrative expenses rose to 29.8% of sales, and adjusted EBITDA fell to $43.1 million, with margin down to 3.7%. Management’s outlook keeps the near-term bar clear: second-quarter comparable sales are expected to decline 1.5% to 2%, while adjusted EBITDA is projected at $55 million to $58 million.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
GO’s Optimization Plan Aims To Lift EBITDA Quality
A key element of the strategy is pruning weaker assets. Grocery Outlet is closing 36 underperforming stores, with 27 closures completed in the first quarter and the remaining nine completed in April.
Management expects these optimization and restructuring actions to produce about $12 million of annualized adjusted EBITDA improvement once completed. The goal is a cleaner fleet mix with less operational drag and more resources concentrated in higher-return locations.
This matters because it links portfolio actions directly to earnings quality. If the company can remove low-return stores while tightening underwriting for new units, the path to more stable profitability becomes clearer.
Grocery Outlet’s Expansion Gets More Disciplined
Expansion is shifting toward returns-focused growth. Management is applying more rigorous site selection, higher return thresholds, and clustered expansion in core markets to improve supply chain efficiency, brand awareness, and operating leverage.
New store underwriting standards are also rising. The company is targeting stores capable of generating returns above 25%, with an ambition to approach 30% over time, and it is prioritizing higher-volume locations with stronger long-term economics.
For the current fiscal year, the plan calls for 30-33 net new store openings, excluding closures tied to optimization actions. That approach is meant to balance growth with profitability and reduce the risk of adding lower-quality units.
GO Valuation Context
The valuation case starts with what has already been discounted. GO shares are down 16.3% year to date, lagging both the Zacks Consumer Staples sector and the broader market.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, Grocery Outlet’s forward 12-month price-to-earnings ratio stands at 15.29, lower than the industry’s ratio of 17.07. It is also trading below its 12-month median level of 19.04, suggesting investors have yet to fully price in the company’s recovery potential.
In practical terms, the multiple has room to expand if comparable sales stabilize, margins stop sliding, and adjusted EBITDA begins to rebuild on cleaner fundamentals.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
A Practical Playbook for GO Investors
For now, the stock carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), which supports a “monitor” posture while investors track whether the company can convert traffic gains into healthier baskets and better profit flow-through. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Signals that fundamentals are improving would include a better comparable-sales trajectory than current guidance, a stabilization in average transaction size, and evidence that margin pressure is easing as promotions normalize. Delivery of the expected annualized adjusted EBITDA uplift from optimization actions would also reinforce the earnings-quality angle.
What would undermine the thesis is a prolonged basket decline, margin pressure that lasts longer than expected, or a weaker comparable-sales trend that keeps leverage out of the model. Competition remains intense, with larger players such as Walmart Inc. (WMT - Free Report) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST - Free Report) able to pressure pricing and promotional activity, which can make GO’s margin stabilization harder to achieve.